Analyze a landmark court rulings explain how this case changed police practices to stay compliant with the law|Quick homework help

Posted: January 23rd, 2023

t 1:  Analyze a landmark court rulings explain how this case changed police practices to stay compliant with the law.

pt2:   Explain one police patrol strategy and compare its strengths and weakness. Would you recommend this strategy to all police departments?

turnitin
We can write
your paper for you
100% original
24/7 service
50+ subjects

pt3:  Analyze one era in American corrections and explain the weaknesses and strengths associated with this method.  If you choose a prior era, do you think that era would work today?

pt4:  Analyze the dual court system in the United States and explain the advantages and disadvantages of a dual system? Do you think the dual court system still fits today’s court demands?

SOLUTION

One example of a landmark court ruling that changed police practices is the Supreme Court case of Miranda v. Arizona (1966). In this case, the Court ruled that any person who is arrested must be informed of their rights under the Fifth Amendment, which includes the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney. This ruling, known as the “Miranda warning,” has become a standard practice for law enforcement agencies across the United States.

Before the Miranda ruling, police officers were not required to inform suspects of their rights during an arrest. As a result, many suspects were not aware of their rights and unknowingly gave incriminating statements or confessions. The Miranda ruling changed this by requiring police officers to inform suspects of their rights before questioning, ensuring that suspects are aware of their rights and can make informed decisions about whether to speak with the police or exercise their right to remain silent.

The Miranda ruling also established that any statement or confession obtained from a suspect who has not been informed of their rights is inadmissible in court. This means that if a suspect is not given the Miranda warning and confesses to a crime, the confession cannot be used as evidence against them in court. This ruling helps to protect the rights of suspects and ensures that the criminal justice system is fair and just.

Expert paper writers are just a few clicks away

Place an order in 3 easy steps. Takes less than 5 mins.

Calculate the price of your order

You will get a personal manager and a discount.
We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00