Moral Justification|Quick homework help

Posted: January 28th, 2023

From  Chapter 10: Moral Justification (Beauchamp & Childress): For this question, briefly compare and contrast the  top-down (pp. 426-432),  bottom-up (pp. 432-439) and  reflective equilibrium (pp. 439-444) models of justification in ethics.

From  Chapter 2: The Requirements of Practical Reason (Curlin & Tollefsen): In this chapter, the authors raise a crucial question: “How do we get from awareness of the basic good of human action to making moral decisions in pursuing those goods?” (p. 36) One answer to this question that many philosophers have defended is a view called  consequentialism (or sometimes  utilitarianism, understood as a particular version or kind of consequentialism). For this question, please answer the following: (a) Briefly explain how Curlin and Tollefsen define consequentialism and utilitarianism; and (b) Briefly explain the three objections that the authors raise against consequentialism. (pp. 37-38)

SOLUTION

Moral justification refers to the reasons or principles that are used to defend or support a particular moral belief or action. It is the process of providing a logical or rational explanation for why a certain action or belief is considered morally right or wrong.

This can involve appealing to religious or secular principles, as well as considering the consequences of a particular action for individuals and society as a whole.