IDENTIFYING GAPS IN THE LITERATURE2|Course hero helper

1. Cover page
2. A literature gap: A description of the gap that you identified in the literature (Week 4)
3. An annotated bibliography of all 10 articles (Weeks 6–8)
4. An outline of your literature review (Week 9)
5. An overview of relevant theories (Identify theories that are referred to in your literature and provide a one-page description of one theory.) (Week 10)
6. References for any articles you cited (outside of the annotated bibliography)RUNNING HEAD: DEVELOPING AN OUTLINE2

    

    

   

   We can write
   your paper for you

   100% original

   24/7 service

   50+ subjects

   Order Now

    

    

    

    

    

    

   Developing an Outline

    

    

   Jailya Wooden

   Walden University

   DPSY 8700

   January 28, 2023 I. Introduction

   A. Definition of Capital Punishment

   B. Overview of the prevalence of Capital Punishment

   C. Overview of the legal and ethical implications of Capital Punishment

   II. Deterrent Effects of Capital Punishment

   A. The effects of capital punishment and the expected drop-in crime rate following execution were studied by A. Cloninger (1992).

   B. Crime rate as determined by B. Decker and Kohfeld’s (1990) study on the death sentence.

   C. The results of both research show that the death sentence does not effectively deter criminal behavior.

   III. Racial Divide and Gender Gap in Death Penalty Support

   A. Data from a poll of 524 college freshmen conducted by A. Godcharles, Rad, Heide, Cochran, and Solomon (2019) to gauge empathy and support for the death sentence.

   B. The survey results show a negative correlation between empathy and support for capital punishment.

   IV. Effects of the Death Penalty on Families of the Accused

   A. The death penalty’s effects on the defendant’s loved ones are examined in detail by A. Sharp (2005).

   B. A review of how the death sentence might affect the offender’s offspring in terms of their access to a quality education and career prospects.

   V. Wrongful Conviction Rate and Death Penalty Support

   A. In order to determine whether the prevalence of erroneous convictions influences people’s opinions on the death sentence, A. Wu (2022) polled over 1,500 persons in the United States.

   B. The results of the study indicate that the number of people who are wrongfully convicted of a crime decreases the number of people who are in favor of the death sentence.

   VI. Conclusion

   A. A concise summary of the moral and factual arguments in favor of the usage of the death penalty

   B. A Synopsis of the Research and Public Opinion Concerning Capital Punishment and Its Effect on the Families of Victims as Well as Public Opinion Concerning Capital Punishment

   C. The repercussions of modifying the way the death sentence is carried out in the United States

   RUNNING HEAD: JOURNAL: CONNECTING TO YOUR DISSERTATION- IDENTIFYING GAPS IN THE LITERATURE2           Journal: Connecting to your Dissertation- Identifying Gaps in the Literature     Jailya J Wooden Walden University DPSY 8700 December 25, 2022   Trahan et al. (2018) presents an intersectional analysis of public opinion on capital punishment in the United States. The authors use American National Election Studies (ANES) data to examine how race, gender, and socioeconomic class interact to influence public opinion on capital punishment. The results showed that African American and Hispanic respondents were more likely than White respondents to oppose capital punishment. The authors also found that men and those with higher incomes were more likely to support capital punishment. The authors suggest that there are racial, gender, and class disparities in public opinion on capital punishment and that this is an important consideration when developing public policy on the issue. The article begins by noting that public opinion on capital punishment has been studied extensively, but few studies have addressed the issue from an intersectional perspective. The authors then review the existing literature on the subject and highlight several gaps in the literature (Trahan et al., 2018). First, the authors note that few studies have examined the intersection of race, gender, and class and how they shape public opinion on capital punishment. They point out that existing studies have focused primarily on race or gender, but not both, and that almost no studies have considered the role of class in shaping public opinion on the issue. Second, the authors note that existing studies have relied on surveys that focus on a narrow set of questions and fail to consider the issue’s complexities. They also point out that surveys often fail to adequately capture the nuances of public opinion, such as how individuals’ views on capital punishment may be shaped by their experiences and beliefs (Trahan et al., 2018). Third, the authors note that existing studies have primarily focused on white individuals’ attitudes toward capital punishment and that there is a need for research that examines the attitudes of individuals from different racial and ethnic backgrounds. They also note that the research has largely ignored the effects of gender and that there is a need for studies focusing on how gender influences public opinion on the issue (Trahan et al., 2018). The fourth gap identified in the review article focuses on the inadequate research on the public’s opinion of the death penalty in cases of terrorism. As terrorism is an increasingly prevalent issue in the United States and worldwide, understanding public opinion on the death penalty in cases of terrorism is essential. By examining the public’s opinion in this context, researchers can gain insight into the potential implications of the death penalty in cases of terrorism and the potential ethical implications of this form of punishment (Trahan et al., 2018). Additionally, the authors note that few studies have considered the influence of socioeconomic status on public opinion and that there is a need for research examining how individuals from different socioeconomic backgrounds view capital punishment. Overall, the review article “Public Opinion of Capital Punishment: An Intersectional Analysis of Race, Gender, and Class Effects” identifies several gaps in the existing literature on the public opinion of capital punishment. Existing studies have primarily focused on white individuals’ attitudes toward the issue. They have failed to consider the issue’s complexities, such as how individuals’ views on capital punishment may be shaped by their experiences and beliefs. Furthermore, existing studies have largely ignored the effects of gender and socioeconomic status, and there is a need for research that examines how individuals from different backgrounds view capital punishment. The authors also call for more research on the intersection of race, gender, and class and how they shape public opinion on capital punishment. By doing so, researchers can better understand how public opinion is shaped by different identities and backgrounds and can make more informed policy decisions.   Reference Trahan, A., Dixon, A., & Nodeland, B. (2018). Public Opinion of Capital Punishment: An Intersectional Analysis of Race, Gender, and Class Effects. Criminal Justice Review, 073401681881868. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734016818818687

SOLUTION

A literature gap refers to the absence of sufficient research or information on a particular topic in the existing body of literature. This means that there is a need for further investigation and exploration in order to address the gap and to gain a deeper understanding of the subject at hand. A literature gap can occur due to a variety of reasons such as the limited scope of previous studies, the emergence of new technologies or concepts, or a lack of attention given to a particular aspect of a subject. Identifying a literature gap is an important step in conducting research as it helps to guide future studies and contribute to the advancement of knowledge in a particular field.