Is torture ever justified from a moral standpoint? Should it be legal in certain situations|Legit essays

Posted: January 30th, 2023

Review Chapter 32. Is torture ever justified from a moral standpoint? Should it be legal in certain situations? What techniques, if any, employed by the Bush administration post-9/11 cross the line from permissible interrogation techniques into torture or CIDTP? (Minimum 300 Words)

Essay writing service:

• Excellent quality
• 100% Turnitin-safe
• Affordable prices

Order Now

SOLUTION

From a moral standpoint, torture is generally considered to be unjustified. The principle of “do no harm” is a fundamental tenet of many ethical systems, and torturing another human being is seen as a violation of this principle. Additionally, many argue that the use of torture is ineffective and can lead to false confessions, further undermining its moral justification.

From a legal standpoint, the use of torture is generally considered to be prohibited under international law. The United Nations Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, which was adopted by the UN General Assembly in 1984, defines torture as “any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him or a third person information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind.”