Management and Operational Systems |My homework aider

Posted: February 26th, 2023

Read the following case study to inform the assignment.

You are the principal of Sunset Hills, a K-8 school with an 800-student population. It is a May mid-morning in Phoenix, Arizona, where the outside temperature has reached a staggering 98 degrees and is rising. While visiting classrooms in the campus’ main building, you begin to notice the classrooms seem to be getting warmer and warmer. At noon the facilities manager notifies you that the central air conditioning units in the building are down. As you continue to walk through classrooms, you observe students sweating and trying to cool down waving their papers as fans.

School does not end until 3:45 p.m.

In a 750-1,000 word analysis, and keeping the district, parents, students, teachers, and the media in mind, address the following:

Management and Operational Systems

· Identify the main decisions that must be made.

· Identify additional information needed to inform your decision.

Human, Fiscal, and Technological Resources

· Organize staff to ensure the safety of students and consistency of response.

· Identify additional resources needed to ensure safety of students and staff.

Safety and Welfare of Students and Staff

· Identify legal rulings regarding the safety and welfare of students and staff to consider in making a decision.

· Identify district policy regarding the safety and welfare of students and staff that might affect a decision.

Collaboration with Faculty and Community

· Identify possible stakeholders involved in the decision-making and/or affected by the recommended solution.

Solution and Rationale

· Explain your solutions for addressing the situation.

· List action steps you would take to implement the solutions, including a timeline for implementing them.

· Provide a rationale for your proposed solutions. Explain how the solution protects the welfare and safety of students and staff, complies with laws, rights, and policies, and involves appropriate stakeholders.

Cite 2-3 scholarly resources to support your analysis.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite Technical Support Articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies and professional standards:

Benchmark – Adverse Situations – Rubric

Management and Operational Systems (B) 45 points

Criteria Description

Management and Operational Systems (C3.1)

5. Target 45 points

Analysis extensively identifies management and operational systems decisions that

must be made, and insightfully identifies information to inform decisions.

4. Acceptable 39.15 points

Analysis accurately identifies management and operational systems decisions that

must be made, and clearly identifies information to inform decisions.

3. Approaching 33.3 points

Analysis ambiguously identifies management and operational systems decisions

that must be made, and minimally identifies information to inform decisions.

2. Insufficient 31.05 points

Analysis erroneously identifies management and operational systems decisions that

must be made and does not identify information to inform decisions.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Human, Fiscal, and Technological Resources (B) 45 points

Criteria Description

Human, Fiscal, and Technological Resources (C3.2)

5. Target 45 points

Analysis compellingly ensures the safety of students or consistency of response.

Additional resources needed to ensure safety of students and staff are meaningful.

4. Acceptable 39.15 points

Collapse All

Analysis properly ensures the safety of students or consistency of response.

Additional resources needed to ensure safety of students and staff are credible.

3. Approaching 33.3 points

Analysis artificially ensures the safety of students or consistency of response.

Additional resources needed to ensure safety of students and staff are lacking

detail.

2. Insufficient 31.05 points

Analysis does not ensure the safety of students or consistency of response.

Additional resources needed to ensure safety of students and staff are not

included.

Safety and Welfare of Students and Sta� (B) 45 points

Criteria Description

Safety and Welfare of Students and Staff (C3.3)

5. Target 45 points

Legal rulings and district policy regarding the safety and welfare of students and

staff are substantial and in depth.

4. Acceptable 39.15 points

Legal rulings and district policy regarding the safety and welfare of students and

staff are relevant and detailed.

3. Approaching 33.3 points

Legal rulings and district policy regarding the safety and welfare of students and

staff are missing key details.

2. Insufficient 31.05 points

Legal rulings and district policy are unrelated to the safety and welfare of students

and staff.

Collaboration with Faculty and Community (B) 45 points

Criteria Description

Collaboration with Faculty and Community (C4.1)

5. Target 45 points

Analysis expertly identifies possible stakeholders involved in the decision-making

and/or affected by the recommended solution.

4. Acceptable 39.15 points

Analysis effectively identifies possible stakeholders involved in the decision-making

and/or affected by the recommended solution.

3. Approaching 33.3 points

Analysis vaguely identifies possible stakeholders involved in the decision-making

and/or affected by the recommended solution.

2. Insufficient 31.05 points

Analysis fails to correctly identify possible stakeholders involved in the decision-

making and/or affected by the recommended solution.

1. No Submission 0 points

Not addressed.

Solution and Rationale 45 points

Criteria Description

Solution and Rationale

5. Target 45 points

Solutions for address

SOLUTION

4. Acceptable 39.15 points

Solutions for addressing the situation are accurately explained. Action steps for implementing the solutions are organized, include a timeline, and are feasible. The rationale for the proposed solutions is convincing and considers the safety and welfare of students and staff, compliance with laws, rights, and policies, and involvement of appropriate stakeholders. Solutions for addressing the situation are ambiguously explained. Action steps for implementing the solutions are minimally organized, include a timeline, and are vague. The rationale for the proposed solutions is not fully developed and minimally considers the safety and welfare of students and staff, compliance with laws, rights, and policies, and involvement of appropriate stakeholders.