Outcomes of the Condemnation of 1277|Course hero helper

Posted: March 14th, 2023

Please answer these questions in paragraph form using my included article, and outside sources. Please paraphrase instead of quotation marks. Please make it about 800 words long.

McClellan discusses the questions concerning continuities versus discontinuities in late medieval
and early modern history and the history of science. He says that: “for the present we can refer to
a middle-ground interpretation of the condemnation of 1277 which sees its effect neither as
wholly squelching scientific inquiry nor as launching the Scientific Revolution outright.”
According to this interpretation, what were the most important outcomings of the condemnation
of 1277 in
a) physics and
b) astronomy
Summarize his explanations and arguments.

Please use this article https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/condemnation/

SOLUTION

The Condemnation of 1277 and the Continuity of Aristotelianism,” James B. McClellan III examines the debate over continuities versus discontinuities in late medieval and early modern history and the history of science. Specifically, he focuses on the condemnation of 1277, a decree issued by the Bishop of Paris that sought to limit the use of Aristotelian philosophy in theological debates. According to McClellan, the conventional view of the condemnation is that it represented a significant turning point in the history of science, one that either squelched scientific inquiry or launched the Scientific Revolution outright. However, he suggests that a more nuanced interpretation sees the condemnation as having neither of these effects, but rather as having a more limited impact on the development of physics and astronomy.