Identifying Research Methodologies|My homework aider

Posted: March 15th, 2023

To Prepare:

• Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.
• Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.
• Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.
• Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

Essay writing service:

• Excellent quality
• 100% Turnitin-safe
• Affordable prices

Order Now

After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

• The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.
• A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
• A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
• A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.
• A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.NUR52 MODULE 2

  PART 1

  NOTE: For Part 1 assignment only utilize original/primary research articles (quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods —- NO “REVIEWS”).

  To Prepare:

  · Review the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. Keep in mind that the clinical issue you identify for your research will stay the same for the entire course.

  · Based on the clinical issue of interest and using keywords related to the clinical issue of interest, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles related to your clinical issue of interest. You should not be using systematic reviews for this assignment, select original research articles.  (i.e. CINAHL, MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane).

  · Review the results of your peer-reviewed research and reflect on the process of using an unfiltered database to search for peer-reviewed research.

  · Reflect on the types of research methodologies contained in the four relevant peer-reviewed articles you selected.

  Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies

  After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following:

  · The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format.

  · A brief (1-paragraph) statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.

  · A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.

  · A brief (1-2 paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific.

  · A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles you selected.

   

  RUBRICS FOR GRADING

  Part 1: Identifying Research Methodologies After reading each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected, use the Matrix Worksheet template to analyze the methodologies applied in each article. Your analysis should include the following: *The full citation of each peer-reviewed article in APA format *A brief statement explaining why you chose this peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest. *A brief description of the aims of the research of each article *A brief description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed methods approach= The response accurately and clearly provides a full citation of each article in APA format. …The responses accurately and thoroughly explain the selection of these articles and/or how they relate to a clinical issue of interest, including a detailed explanation of the ethics of research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the aims of the research. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the research methodology used, and clearly identify the type of methodology used with specific and relevant examples. …The responses accurately and clearly describe the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including a detailed explanation of the reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the articles selected.

   

  Resource Synthesis= The responses provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources related to the selection of articles and two or three course-specific resources in addition to the four articles reviewed in the matrix.

   

  This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

  Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

   

   

  REQUIRED READING FOR REFRENCING

  · Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018).  Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer.

  · Chapter 2, “Asking Compelling Clinical Questions” (pp. 33–54)

  · Chapter 21, “Generating Evidence Through Quantitative and Qualitative Research” (pp. 607–653)

  · Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies.  Health Information and Libraries Journal Links to an external site. , 26, 91–108. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x

  · Hoare, Z., & Hoe, J. (2013). Understanding quantitative research: Part 2.  Nursing Standard Links to an external site. , 27(18), 48–55. doi:10.7748/ns2013.01.27.18.48.c9488

  · Hoe, J., & Hoare, Z. (2012). Understanding quantitative research: Part 1.  Nursing Standard Links to an external site. , 27(15), 52–57. doi:10.7748/ns2012.12.27.15.52.c9485

  · Walden University Library. (n.d.-a).  Databases A-Z: Nursing Links to an external site. . Retrieved September 6, 2019, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

  · Walden University Library. (n.d.-b).  Evaluating resources: Primary & secondary sources Links to an external site. .Links to an external site.  Retrieved January 22, 2020, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/sources

SOLUTION

Research methodology used: The research methodology used in this article was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of MBSR interventions for stress management among nursing professionals. The authors conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases to identify relevant studies, screened studies for eligibility, extracted data from included studies, and synthesized the evidence using statistical methods.